Safety and Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with ALA 10% Topical Gel Activated by Red Light versus ALA 20% Topical Solution Activated by Blue Light for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Upper Extremities: A Blinded Randomized Study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Photodynamic therapy, PDT, ALA, Aminolevulinic Acid, Actinic keratosis, AK, Extremities, Red light, ALA 10%
Abstract
Background: Actinic keratosis (AKs) is a pre-cancerous skin neoplasm that can appear as erythematous to pink scaly plaques at sites of ultraviolet light damage. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) 10% gel activated by red light is approved by the FDA for the treatment of AKs on the face and scalp, and ALA 20% solution activated by blue light is approved for PDT treatment of AKs on the face, scalp, and upper extremities. While both options have been proven to an effective treatment on the upper extremity, there has been no direct side-by-side comparison. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of both PDT on the upper extremities.
Design: This was a prospective, single-center, split-arm randomized clinical trial with 20 adult subjects presenting with 4-17 clinically confirmed mild-moderate AKs (Olsen grading) on each distal upper extremity. Subjects were treated with ALA 10% gel/red light and ALA 20% solution/blue light PDT on respective randomly selected upper extremities. Lesion complete clearance rate (LCCR) served as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included complete clearance per patient side (PatCR), LCCR of moderate lesions, LCCR 12 weeks after PDT-1, PatCR 12 weeks after PDT-1, overall cosmetic outcome assessed by the investigator, and patient satisfaction.
Results: The LCCR was significantly greater for ALA10% vs. ALA20% at Day 120; no significant differences were observed at the other observed time points. 30 patients were enrolled in the study and received their first treatment (PDT1). LCCRs after PDT1 were 65.4% and 58.4% for ALA10% and ALA 20%, respectively. 25 patients received a second treatment (PDT2), resulting in LCCRs of 88.2% and 72.1% respectively. 22 patients returned for follow-up 6 months after their last PDT treatment (PDT1 or PDT2), with LCCR of 83.7% (ALA10%) and 79.3% (ALA20%). 17 patients returned for follow-up 12 months after the last PDT treatment, with LCCRs of 81.5% (ALA10%) and 87.6% (ALA20%). There were no statistical differences between ALA10% and ALA20% for subject-reported pain or satisfaction ratings. ALA10% was rated as significantly easier to apply compared to ALA20% by the investigator.
Conclusion: Both ALA10% and ALA20% appear to be safe and effective for PDT treatment of AKs on the upper extremities. There is a trend for increased efficacy with ALA10%, and it may be easier to apply. Additional data is in the process of being collected as the study continues.
References
2. DirschkaT, Ekanayake-BohligS, DominicusR, AschoffR, Herrera-Ceballos E, Botella-Estrada R, et al. Photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a multicentre, randomized, observer-blind phase III study in comparison with a registered methyl-5-aminolaevulinate cream and placebo. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 166(1):137-46.
3. Reinhold U, Dirschka T, Ostendorf R, Aschoff R, Berking C, Philipp-Dormston WG, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BF-200 ALA Ameluz® vs. placebo in the field-directed treatment of mild-to-moderate actinic keratosis with photodynamic therapy (PDT) when using the BF-RhodoLED® lamp. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(4):696-705.
4. Ulrich M, Reinhold U, Dominicus R, Aschoff R, Szeimies RM, Dirschka T. Red light photodynamic therapy with BF-200 ALA showed superior efficacy in the treatment of actinic keratosis on the extremities, trunk, and neck in a vehicle-controlled phase III study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Mar 17:S0190-9622(21)00575-2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.031.
5. Brian Jiang, S. I., Kempers, S., Rich, P., Marcus, S., Houlihan, A., Piacquadio, D., & Pariser, D.A Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses on the Upper Extremities.Dermatol Surg,2019;45(7), 890-897.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY): lets others distribute and copy the article, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honor or reputation.
Authors retain copyright in their work and license the publisher to publish the content. The publisher is the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, with production and publishing support provided by OJS, Open Journal Systems,see https://pkp.sfu.
Prior to January 2022, authors transferred copyright to the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. However, all articles are freely available to anyone in the world. There are no subscription fees, page charges, or article processing charges.