Bimekizumab impact on patient-reported outcomes in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: Pooled Week 48 results from BE HEARD I&II
Main Article Content
Keywords
bimekizumab, hidradenitis suppurativa
Abstract
Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has substantial negative effects on patients’ lives,1 with debilitating symptoms, such as intense pain/fatigue/draining and odor, which lead to overall low quality of life (QoL).1,2 Bimekizumab (BKZ) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A; clinical efficacy was previously shown in the phase 3 BE HEARD I&II trials.3 Here, the impact of BKZ on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate to severe HS in BE HEARD I&II is reported.
Procedure/Study: Pooled data included an initial (Weeks [Wks]0–16) and maintenance (Wks16–48) treatment period. Patients were randomized 2:2:2:1 (initial/maintenance) to BKZ 320 mg every 2 wks (Q2W)/Q2W, BKZ Q2W/ Q4W, BKZ Q4W/Q4W or placebo (PBO)/BKZ Q2W. HS Symptom Questionnaire (HSSQ; each symptom item scored 0–10) mean values are reported to Wk48 for skin pain, itch, smell/odor, and drainage/oozing. Proportions of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; scored 0–30; improvement from baseline score ≥4) were reported at Wk16 and Wk48. Data are reported as observed case.
Results: Overall, 1,014 patients were randomized to BKZ Q2W/Q2W (N=288), BKZ Q2W/Q4W (N=292), BKZ Q4W/Q4W (N=288), PBO/BKZ Q2W (N=146). Within each HSSQ item, similar baseline scores were observed across treatment groups. At Wk16, for skin pain, itch, smell/odor and draining/oozing, greater improvements (i.e. score reduction) from baseline were seen in BKZ- vs PBO-treated patients. HSSQ item scores were substantially reduced from Wk16 to Wk48 in Wk16 PBO/BKZ switchers, further decreases were observed in those continually treated with BKZ. At Wk16, a greater proportion of BKZ- vs PBO-treated patients achieved MCID in DLQI: BKZ Q2W/Q2W, 64.6%; BKZ Q2W/Q4W, 54.9%; BKZ Q4W/Q4W, 63.5% vs PBO, 49.1%. At Wk48, a greater proportion of patients continually treated with BKZ achieved MCID in DLQI vs at Wk16; Wk16 PBO/BKZ switchers attained similar proportions (BKZ Q2W/Q2W: 73.4%; BKZ Q2W/Q4W: 63.5%; BKZ Q4W/Q4W: 74.5%; PBO/BKZ Q2W: 76.5%).
Conclusion: At Wk16, BKZ-treated patients achieved a reduction from baseline of HS symptoms: skin pain, itch, smell/odor, and drainage/oozing. Clinically meaningful health-related QoL improvements from baseline were observed and maintained/slightly improved through Wk48. PBO/BKZ switchers experienced improvements in PRO responses from Wk16 to Wk48 and achieved comparable outcomes at Wk48 to patients continually treated with BKZ.
References
2. Kaur AP. Skin Health Dis 2023;3:e212;
3. Kimball AB. Lancet 2024;403:2504–19.