Deucravacitinib, an Oral Selective Tyrosine Kinase 2 (TYK2) Inhibitor, in Patients with Moderate to Severe Scalp Psoriasis: Efficacy and Safety Results of a Phase 3b/4, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial (PSORIATYK SCALP)
Main Article Content
Keywords
Psoriasis
Abstract
Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. PSORIATYK SCALP, an ongoing, 52-week, phase 3b/4, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated deucravacitinib efficacy/safety in patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, including those with more limited overall psoriasis.
Methods: Adults with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis defined by more focused and objective inclusion criteria (ss-PGA ≥3, scalp surface area involvement ≥20%, and PSSI ≥12 at baseline) and BSA involvement ≥3% were randomized 1:2 to oral placebo or deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily through Week 16. The primary efficacy outcome was ss-PGA 0/1; key secondary outcomes were PSSI 90, change from baseline in scalp-specific itch numeric rating scale (NRS), and sPGA 0/1 at Week 16. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated at Week 16 for the overall population and the subpopulation with global sPGA ≥3. Nonresponder imputation and modified baseline observation carried forward were used for patients who discontinued or had missing data for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.
Results: 154 patients were randomized (placebo, n=51; deucravacitinib, n=103). Baseline characteristics were similar in each group (placebo: mean BSA 10.0%, PASI 9.4, PSSI 32.2; deucravacitinib: mean BSA 10.5%, PASI 10.2, PSSI 33.5). In the overall population, a higher proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib versus placebo achieved ss-PGA 0/1 at Week 16 (48.5% vs 13.7%; P<0.0001). Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo for PSSI 90 (38.8% vs 2.0%; P<0.0001) and mean change from baseline in scalp-specific itch NRS (−3.2 vs −0.7; P<0.0001). In the subpopulation (sPGA ≥3), a greater proportion achieved sPGA 0/1 with deucravacitinib versus placebo (51.0% vs 4.3%; P<0.0001). The most common adverse events (AEs) in the deucravacitinib group (≥5%) were nasopharyngitis (14.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (11.7%), acne (9.7%), headache (7.8%), COVID-19 (5.8%), and pustular acne (5.8%). Two serious AEs were reported (1/group); neither was considered treatment related or led to discontinuation.
Conclusion: Deucravacitinib was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis, including those with less extensive overall psoriasis (BSA ≥3%). The overall psoriasis response rate (sPGA 0/1) was consistent with POETYK trial results, despite including patients with more limited BSA involvement. Safety findings were consistent with the known deucravacitinib safety profile.
References
2. Sotyktu [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol Myers Squibb; September 2022.
3. Sotyktu [European summary of product characteristics]. Dublin, Ireland: Bristol Myers Squibb EEIG; December 2023.
4. Sotyktu [package insert]. Tokyo, Japan: Bristol Myers Squibb K.K.; September 2022.
5. Sotyktu [product monograph]. Montreal, Canada: Bristol Myers Squibb Canada Co.; November 2022.
6. Sotyktu [product information]. Mulgrave, VIC, Australia: Bristol Myers Squibb Australia Pty. Ltd.; December 2022.
7. Wrobleski ST, et al. J Med Chem. 2019;62:8973-8995.
8. Armstrong AW, et al. J Am Acad
Dermatol. 2023;88:29-39.
9. Strober B, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88:40-51.
10. Kragballe K. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2009;38:160-171.
11. Chan CS, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:962-971.
12. Rich P, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:134-142.
13. Papp K, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:1151-1160.
14. Kragballe K, et al. J Dermatol Treat. 2013;24:188-192.
15. Mason AR, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169:519-527.
16. Blauvelt A, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90:775-782.
17. Wang Y, et al. J Dermatol Treat. 2019;30:775-783.
18. Winthrop KL. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13:234-243