Extensive Foreign Body Granulomas Induced by Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler

Main Article Content

Aleia Boccardi, DO
Aysham Chaudry, DO
Christopher J. Mancuso, DO, MHS
Jennifer A. Racanelli, DO
Ata S. Moshiri, MD, MPH

Keywords

Foreign Body Granuloma, Delayed Inflammatory Nodule, Cosmetics, Filler Adverse Reactions, Biofilms, Inflammatory Reactions

Abstract

Background: Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) is a biocompatible dermal filler used for soft tissue augmentation and collagen stimulation. While generally well-tolerated, rare cases of delayed onset inflammatory nodules, including foreign body granulomas, have been reported. The mechanism for these reactions remains unclear, with potential contributing factors including large particle size, injection technique, and pathogenic contamination leading to biofilm formation. 


Case presentation: A 69-year-old female presented with multiple firm, erythematous nodules on the face and neck six months after receiving CaHA filler injections at her esthetician’s house. Histopathologic analysis revealed granulomatous inflammation with foreign body giant cells surrounding birefringent material, consistent with a foreign body reaction to CaHA. Although no biofilm was identified, concerns were raised regarding potential contamination due to the non-sterile injection environment. The patient was treated with oral corticosteroids and weekly intralesional triamcinolone injections, leading to gradual improvement over ten months, though residual nodules remained.


Conclusion: This case underscores the potential for granulomatous reactions following CaHA filler injections, especially in non-sterile environments. Given the increasing popularity of soft-tissue fillers, dermatologists should maintain a high index of suspicion for inflammatory reactions and emphasize the importance of sterile injection practices.




References

1. Loghem JV, Yutskovskaya YA, Philip Werschler WM. Calcium Hydroxylapatite. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2015;8(1):38-49.

2. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. accessdata. Accessed October 21, 2024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf5/P050052b.pdf.

3. Moulonguet I, Arnaud E, Bui P, Plantier F. Foreign body reaction to Radiesse: 2 cases. Am J Dermatopathol. 2013;35(3):e37-40. doi:10.1097/DAD.0b013e3182732324

4. Shahrabi-Farahani S, Lerman MA, Noonan V, Kabani S, Woo SB. Granulomatous foreign body reaction to dermal cosmetic fillers with intraoral migration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(1):105-110. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2013.10.008

5. Schwartz LR, Thompson C, Campanelli C. Calcium hydroxylapatite filler foreign body granulomas: A case report of a rare occurrence and review of the literature. Cosmet Dermatol. 2014;27(1).

6. Lolis M, Dunbar SW, Goldberg DJ, Hansen TJ, MacFarlane DF. Patient safety in procedural dermatology: Part II. Safety related to cosmetic procedures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(1):15-26. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.036

7. Zhang YL, Sun ZS, Hong WJ, Chen Y, Zhou YF, Luo SK. Biofilm formation is a risk factor for late and delayed complications of filler injection. Front Microbiol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1297948. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1297948. PMID: 38260874; PMCID: PMC10800873.

8. Ibrahim, Omer; Overman, Joseph; Arndt, Kenneth A.; Dover, Jeffrey S. . (2017). Filler Nodules. Dermatologic Surgery, (), 1–.doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001

9. Christensen L., Breiting V., Janssen M., Vuust J., Hogdall E. (2005). Adverse reactions to injectable soft tissue permanent fillers. Aesthet. Plast. Surg. 29, 34–48. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0113-6

10. Decates, Thomas S. MD, PhD1; Budding, Andries E. MD, PhD2; Velthuis, Peter J. MD, PhD1; Bachour, Yara MD, PhD3; Wolters, Lisanne W.2; Schelke, Leonie W. MD, PhD1; Nijsten, Tamar E. C. MD, PhD1; Niessen, Frank B. MD, PhD3. Bacterial Contamination Is Involved in the Etiology of Soft-Tissue Filler, Late-Onset, Inflammatory Adverse Events. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 151(5):p 971-978, May 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010074

Most read articles by the same author(s)