Safety Profile of Lebrikizumab in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Integrated Data used in the US Prescribing Information

Main Article Content

Linda Stein Gold
Gaia Gallo,
Maria Lucia Buziqui Piruzeli
Fangyi Zhao
Sarah Reifeis
Hany Elmaraghy
Mark Lebwohl

Keywords

adult atopic dermatitis, lebrikizumab, safety

Abstract

Introduction: Lebrikizumab was recently approved in the US for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Safety data have been reported from individual trial disclosures and multiple long-term integrated lebrikizumab analyses. Here we present integrated safety data from the US Prescribing Information.


Methods: Data were summarized from three datasets: 1) Week 0–16 PBO-controlled analysis (lebrikizumab 250 mg every two weeks [LEBQ2W] versus PBO, presented as monotherapy studies [ADvocate1, NCT04146363; ADvocate2, NCT04178967; and Phase 2b KGAF, NCT03443024] and the topical corticosteroid (TCS) combination study [ADhere, NCT04250337]); 2) Maintenance period of monotherapy studies ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 (LEBQ2W-treated patients who responded at week 16 and received LEBQ2W, LEBQ4W or PBO [LEB withdrawal] to week 52); and 3) Week 0–52/56 analysis (patients treated with LEBQ2W only, or LEBQ2W then LEBQ4W up to 52 or 56 weeks). Study-size-adjusted percentages were calculated for the pooled PBO-controlled analysis and maintenance period. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) were number of patients reporting an event per 100 patient-years at risk.


Results: PBO-controlled analysis included 338 PBO-treated and 638 LEBQ2W-treated patients in the monotherapy studies and 66 PBO-treated and 145 LEBQ2W-treated patients in the TCS study. During the maintenance period 113, 118, and 60 patients received LEBQ2W, LEBQ4W, and PBO, respectively. In Week 0-52/56 analysis 844 and 147 patients received LEBQ2W and LEBQ2W/Q4W, respectively. For PBO-controlled, adverse reactions that occurred in ≥1% of LEBQ2W-treated patients in monotherapy or TCS studies, and at a higher rate than PBO, were conjunctivitis cluster (monotherapy trials: n=61 [9.6%], LEBQ2W; n=10 [3.0%], PBO; TCS trial: n=7 [4.8%], LEBQ2W; n=0, PBO); injection site reactions (monotherapy trials: n=16 [2.6%], LEBQ2W; n=4 [1.2%], PBO; TCS trial: n=4 [2.8%], LEBQ2W; n=1 [1.5%], PBO); and herpes zoster (HZ) (monotherapy trials: n=3 [0.5%], LEBQ2W; n=0, PBO; TCS trial: n=2 [1.4%] LEBQ2W; n=0, PBO). All events were nonserious; most were mild/moderate severity. No HZ events were considered opportunistic infections or led to treatment discontinuation. In the monotherapy studies, 15 (2.4%) LEBQ2W-treated and 6 (1.8%) PBO-treated patients discontinued treatment due to AEs; in the TCS study, 3 (2.1%) LEBQ2W-treated and 0 PBO-treated patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Eosinophilia and keratitis cluster were reported in <1% of LEBQ2W-treated patients. During the maintenance period there were 2 (1.8%), 12 (10.1%) and 5 (8.3%) conjunctivitis cluster events in LEBQ2W, LEBQ4W, and PBO, respectively. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis was reported by 1 (0.8%) patient in LEBQ4W; vernal keratoconjunctivitis was reported by 1 (0.9%) patient in LEBQ2W; no events reported in PBO. In the Week 0–52/56 analysis, the IR of conjunctivitis was 18.3 for LEBQ2W and 20.6 for LEBQ2W/Q4W.


Conclusions: For the adverse reactions reported in the lebrikizumab US Prescribing Information, the majority were mild to moderate in severity and few led to treatment discontinuation.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>