Evaluating the Impact of the Dermatology Medical Literacy Program on Undergraduate Trainee Outcomes

Main Article Content

Rebecca Joseph, BS
Alexander D. Smith, B.S
Hannah Chaudhury, B.S
Gaurav Agrawal, B.A
Milcah Poothakary, BA
Michelle B. Tarbox, MD

Keywords

DMLA, education, Social Determinants of Health, dermatology

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatology is a complex specialty, and early education and exposure can meaningfully contribute to generating interest and enhancing long-term involvement in the specialty. The Dermatology Medical Literacy Advocacy (DMLA) program at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center was designed to broaden the undergraduate students' base of knowledge, skills, and exposure to health disparities of dermatology.


Methods: The program included sixteen bi-weekly 2-hour lectures, participatory workshops, and exposure to the community. The quality of the program was assessed by the prospective study through the use of pre- and post-surveys.


Results: Results indicated substantial improvements in students' knowledge of dermatology, recognition of health disparities, and ease with dermatologic competencies. Ease with community outreach also improved slightly, yet not to the point of a statistically significant factor.


Conclusions: The DMLA program successfully improved prime areas of dermatology education. Future iterations will address additional community involvement via direct activity, the area where most deficit occurred.

References

1. Ferreira IG, Weber MB, Bonamigo RR. History of dermatology: the study of skin diseases over the centuries. An Bras Dermatol. May-Jun 2021;96(3):332-345. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2020.09.006

2. Alani A, Sadlier M, Uddin A, Hackett C, Ramsay B, Ahmad K. An analysis of inpatient dermatologic consultations at University Hospital Limerick: inadequate infrastructure leads to acute skin failure. Ir J Med Sci. May 2017;186(2):305-307. doi:10.1007/s11845-016-1424-8

3. Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. Jun 2014;134(6):1527-1534. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.446

4. Balboul S, Gronbeck C, Feng H. Dermatology workforce projections in the United States, 2021 to 2036. Arch Dermatol Res. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.; 2024:192. vol. 5.

5. Ulman CA, Binder SB, Borges NJ. Assessment of medical students' proficiency in dermatology: Are medical students adequately prepared to diagnose and treat common dermatologic conditions in the United States? J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2015;12:18. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.18

6. Alikhan A, Sivamani RK, Mutizwa MM, Aldabagh B. Advice for medical students interested in dermatology: perspectives from fourth year students who matched. Dermatol Online J. Jul 15 2009;15(7):4.

7. Boswell ND, Porter CL, Feldman SR, Akkurt ZM. How should medical students prepare for a clinical dermatology rotation? Dermatol Online J. Jun 15 2021;27(6)doi:10.5070/d327654052

8. Duniphin DD. Limited Access to Dermatology Specialty Care: Barriers and Teledermatology. Dermatol Pract Concept. Jan 1 2023;13(1)doi:10.5826/dpc.1301a31

9. Bowers S, Chang AY. The Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on Dermatologic Health, Part 1: The Social Determinants of Health and Their Dermatologic Implications. Dermatol Clin. Apr 2023;41(2):309-316. doi:10.1016/j.det.2022.10.002

10. Murase JE. Understanding the importance of dermatology training in undergraduate medical education. Dermatol Pract Concept. Apr 2015;5(2):95-6. doi:10.5826/dpc.0502a18

11. Blakely K, Bahrani B, Doiron P, Dahlke E. Early Introduction of Dermatology Clinical Skills in Medical Training. J Cutan Med Surg. Jan/Feb 2020;24(1):47-54. doi:10.1177/1203475419882341

Most read articles by the same author(s)