The i31-SLNB Identifies Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma Who Have Less than 5% Risk of SLN Positivity while the CP-GEP does not

Main Article Content

J. Michael Guenther
Samuel Dierks
John Vetto

Keywords

Gene expression profile

Abstract

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a prognostic procedure that can help guide surveillance and treatment management plans for patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, up to 88% of SLNBs are negative, suggesting that most patients may not require SLNB. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity should avoid SLNB, whereas those with a risk of 5-10% should be considered for SLNB, and those with a risk of >10% should be offered SLNB. This study compared the performance of two gene expression profile (GEP) tests designed to identify patients with low risk (<5% risk) of SLN positivity: the i31-SLNB and CP-GEP. 


Methods: SLN false-negative rates were analyzed for the i31-SLNB using data from Whitman et al. (JCO PO 2021; T1-T4: n=1,258) and for the CP-GEP using publicly available data from Sondak et al. (Society for Melanoma Research 2024; T1-T3: n=1,686). Only patients who had an SLNB were included in the analysis. False negative rate (FNR) is calculated as 1-NPV. 


Results: The i31-SLNB had an FNR = 3.9% in patients classified as low risk (n=233) which is below the 5% guideline cut point for avoiding an SLNB. The CP-GEP had an FNR = 7.1% in patients classified as low risk (n=624) which is above the 5% guideline cut point for avoiding an SLNB. Comparing FNRs in T1b tumors showed that the i31-SLNB had an FNR = 2.8% compared with 5.1% for the CP-GEP. Similar results were seen among T2a tumors, with the i31-SLNB having an FNR = 4.3% compared with an FNR = 7.3% for the CP-GEP. 


Conclusions: The i31-SLNB accurately identifies patients with a risk of SLN positivity below the NCCN guideline of 5% risk threshold for avoiding SLNB, with a false-negative rate nearly 50% lower than that of CP-GEP. Conversely, patients identified as low risk by CP-GEP had SLN positivity rates over 5%, suggesting it is not sufficient for informing clinical decisions regarding SLNB. 

References

1. Chen J, et al. Oncotarget, 2016.

2. NCCN Melanoma Guidelines, 2023.

3. Whitman ED, et al. JCO Precis Oncol, 2021.

4. Jarell A, et al. Future Oncol, 2021.

5. Bellomo D, et al. JCO Precision Oncology, 2020.

5. Sondak V. SMR, 2024.​