Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel for Moderate to Severe Acne: Efficacy and Safety Results From 4 Clinical Trials

Main Article Content

Leon H. Kircik
Zoe D. Draelos
Edward (Ted) Lain
Julie C. Harper
Hilary Baldwin
Eric Guenin
Linda Stein Gold
Michael Gold

Keywords

acne, moderate, severe, topical, combination treatment, retinoid, antimicrobial, antibiotic

Abstract

Introduction: For most patients with acne, combination treatments targeting multiple pathogenic processes are recommended. Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1% (CAB) gel is the only fixed-dose, triple-combination topical approved for acne. Analyses were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of topical fixed-combination CAB gel vs 3 constituent dyad gels and commercially available adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% gel across 4 clinical trials.


Methods: In pooled, post hoc analyses of two phase 2 (one head-to-head) and two phase 3 randomized, double-blind, 12-week clinical trials, CAB gel (n=618), 3 constituent dyad gels (n=146 or 150 each), commercially available adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% gel (n=226), and vehicle (n=497) were compared in participants with moderate-to-severe acne. Assessments included treatment success (≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin), least-squares mean percent change from baseline in inflammatory/ noninflammatory lesion counts, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).


Results: By week 12, >50% of CAB-treated participants achieved treatment success (51.0%), significantly more than approximately 33% treated with dyads or adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% (range, 30.7%-35.8%) and <20% treated with vehicle (18.3%; P≤0.001, all). Inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion reductions at week 12 were significantly greater with CAB (76.9%/71.8%) versus dyads (range, 64.2%-69.2%/59.1%-61.1%; P<0.001, all), adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% (73.0%/67.5%; P<0.05, both), and vehicle (52.9%/46.6%; P<0.001, both). Most TEAEs were mild-moderate in severity across all groups. TEAE rates for CAB and both adapalene/BPO gels were similar, indicating the addition of clindamycin did not worsen tolerability.


Conclusions: CAB triple-combination gel demonstrated significantly greater efficacy vs component dyads and commercially available adapalene 0.3%/BPO 2.5% gel in this 4-trial pooled analysis. By week 12, CAB-treated participants had ~77% reduction in inflammatory lesion counts and half achieved clear/almost clear skin. To our knowledge, these analyses include data from the only double-blind, vehicle-controlled, head-to-head trial of topical combination acne treatments.


Funding: Ortho Dermatologics

References

1.Reynolds RV, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(5):1006.e1001-1006.e1030.

2.Huang CY, et al. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21(4):358-369.

3.Stein Gold L, et al. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022;23(1):93-104.

4.Stein Gold L, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89(5):927-935.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>